This new Confirmatory Grounds Investigation of your own Individual Partnership Measure (ECP) showed that the initial design proposed because of the article writers don’t features a sufficient easily fit into the present day test ([chi square] / df = 5.63, GFI = .93, CFI = .86, TLI = .84, RMSEA = .07), particularly with regards to the [chi-square] / df, CFI e TLI values. Within the white ones efficiency and because of the parameters made use of (Browne Cudeck, 1992; Hu Bentler, 1999; Segars Grover, 1993) we decided to proceed which have a keen Exploratory Factor Analysis.
The Exploratory Factor Data of one’s Individual Union Measure (ECP), as Dominant Axis Factoring, revealed brand new unidimensional design of one’s size, while the precisely the option of among section hit the fresh lowest Eigenvalue of 1. It was in addition to clear for the translation of the scree-area chart (Industry, 2009).
A mathematically extreme effect of the partnership status with the private partnership degrees of the participants F(step three, nine20) = nine
The accuracy of dimension is actually reviewed through the inner structure of one’s scale, in the form of Cronbach’s leader, as well as the adequacy of any items was also confirmed (Dining table step 1). It actually was confirmed that products step 3 and you will 10 didn’t meet minimal conditions to own inclusion, to your loading to have goods ten underneath the worthy of thought acceptable, both got poor product-total correlations additionally the elimination of each other factors increased the full worth of Cronbach’s leader, toward really worth before reduction are .80. From inside the white associated with data, the option was developed to eliminate both of these situations throughout the investigation (; Nunnally Bernstein, 1994). These things coincide just with the one or two factors the fresh writers think as being in line with the fresh meta-relationship dimensions, hence becoming theoretically adequate the empirical distinction regarding the remainder of the things and their exception on level. The last unidimensional build, without any called things, shows you % of your own full variance, that have appropriate product-overall correlations (Profession, 2009) anywhere between .36 and you may .sixty and with an entire mediocre score of five.56 (DP = .86). The fresh new Cronbach alphas are different ranging from .82 for the complete try, .83 and you can .81 correspondingly towards male and female sample. On the five subgroups, we received .82, .80, .70 and .84 respectively for members into the an online dating relationships, relationship with cohabitation, formal relationship and married people. We can hence believe all interior structure indicator since a great (Cronbach, 1970; ).
The average ECP scores in the current sample are as follows, 5.56 (DP = .86) for the total sample, 5.48 (DP = .86) for women and 5.70 (DP = .83) for men. This difference is significant F(1, 922) = ; p < .001; [[eta].sup.2]p = .02.
Just like the demonstrated analyses was basically completed, they were accompanied by the new exploration of the numerous dating statuses found in the take to regarding professionals (Desk step three) on show received what is getiton because of the these types of on Portuguese form of the size and style for this reason confirmed, brand new ECP
Continuing with the validation of the Personal Commitment Scale (ECP), we proceeded with the concurrent validity criteria analysis. The global values for personal commitment showed, as expected, significant positive correlations (p < .001) with the total RRF-R (.63) and with all its subscales (Passion, .64; Confidence, .51; Conflicts, .44; Intimacy, .45), which indicate that higher levels of personal commitment correlated with higher indices of relationship quality, in all its dimensions.
The significance of the effect of the relationship status on the level of personal commitment of the participants was evaluated by the ANOVA one way method, in which the normality (p < .05 for three of the four types of relationship statuses) and homoscedasticity analyses W(3, 920) = 1.06; p = .298 were sufficiently robust to proceed with the analyses. 59; p < .001; [[eta].sup.2]p = .03 was observed.