Volume analysis was in fact delivered uniformly along side size (Fig

Volume analysis was in fact delivered uniformly along side size (Fig


2A). As the advice, STETHOSCOPE (M = step one.333), EMPEROR (Yards = step one.407), and you may Palace (M = step one.579) was indeed ranked among the minimum frequent signs in ASL-LEX, and you will Liquids (Yards = 6.963), Your (Yards = six.889), and you will Myself (M = 6.76) was basically rated being among the most constant cues.

We conducted a comparison of subjective frequency estimates from ASL-LEX and another independent dataset that used the same 1–7 rating scale for ASL signs, although the ratings were from deaf ASL signers residing in Canada (). We verified that a total of 297 items shared the same sign form in both datasets. The raw frequency ratings in the two datasets were moderately correlated (r s = 0.65, p < .001), suggesting good external validity. We also conducted a cross-linguistic comparison between raw subjective frequency estimates for a subset of 226 ASL and BSL signs from Vinson et al. (2008) that had translation equivalents in English (same rating scale). The results revealed a moderate correlation (r s = 0.52, p < .001), suggesting that signs expressing similar concepts in two different sign languages (evidenced by the same English translation) tend to receive similar frequency estimates. Using Fisher's r-to-z transformation, we found that the ASL-ASL correlation was stronger than the ASL-BSL correlation (z = 2.24, p = 0.0251). In addition, raw frequency ratings were moderately correlated with log10 word frequencies of their English translations from SUBTLEXUs (r s = 0.58, p < .001). The ASL-ASL correlation did not statistically differ from the ASL-English correlation (z = 1.69, p = 0.091).

Surprisingly, Bates mais aussi al. (2003) located comparable lexical regularity correlations certainly seven verbal dialects (Mean r = .51; SD = .079), even yet in typologically diverse dialects such English and Mandarin Chinese (r = .53). Bates mais aussi al. (2003) hypothesize your seemingly large consistency out-of product reviews across the dialects can get end up being related to mutual social knowledge. This will be a likely explanation toward discovering that within a comparable language and you will/otherwise people (ASL-ASL; ASL-English), new correlation is actually more powerful than across languages and cultures (ASL-BSL). There can be maxims that will be a great deal more culturally connected to deaf teams as well as their spoken competitors from inside the America than in the United kingdom, and therefore you’ll influence the fresh new frequency in which specific terminology/signs are used within the for each and every language, in addition to participants’ comprehension of the new rules themselves.


Iconicity ratings was indeed skewed into budget of your own size (Fig. 2B), showing you to definitely signs within ASL-LEX were basically considered to provides low iconicity thinking. Although we picked brand new cues on goal of gaining a great typical regularity distribution, contra Vinson mais aussi al. (2008) i failed to find cues with a target iconicity delivery (we.age., specifically in search of cues at the each other ends of iconicity distribution). Our very own performance ergo imply that lexicalized ASL signs is off low iconicity whenever regularity can often be marketed. Publication (Indicate Iconicity = 6.684) and you can ZIPPER (Yards = six.394) are some of the extremely renowned signs when you look at the ASL-LEX, and you can Yesterday (M = step one.086) and Sluggish (Meters = 1.567) are among the minimum renowned signs.

Phonological services

The fresh new shipping regarding phonological properties is visible inside Fig. step three. The newest “neutral” slight area try more repeated (N = 345), the next five popular metropolitan areas was indeed palm (N = 92), almost every other Footnote cuatro (N = 76) https://datingranking.net/android/, chin (Letter = 60) and you may vision (Letter = 60). The remaining twenty-eight slight towns and cities had been represented by fifty or fewer cues. The prices off slight locations are in the main.csv document in the OSF (

Frequency shipment out-of phonological functions from inside the ASL-LEX. Having selected fingertips, meters = center fist, roentgen = ring-finger, p = pinky, we = directory fist. Having Indication Types of, HS = handshape